Genachowski:
"Fourth, the rules recognize that broadband providers need meaningful flexibility to manage their networks to deal with congestion, security, and other issues. And we also recognize the importance and value of business-model experimentation, such as tiered pricing. These are practical necessities, and will help promote investment in, and expansion of, high-speed broadband networks. So, for example, the order rules make clear that broadband providers can engage in "reasonable network management"." I'm not sure "reasonable" will be defined until the actual rules are released. Rick From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of David E. Smith Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 2010 3:39 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] Open Meeting Statements - Preserving the Open Internet: Commissioner's Comments On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 14:21, Rick Harnish <rharn...@wispa.org> wrote: http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/index.do?document=303746 Any analysis yet on whether WISPA got part of what it was asking for? I've skimmed those notes, and aside from one brief mention by Commissioner McDowell I don't see anything regarding fixed-wireless at all. David Smith MVN.net
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
