20 mhz with nv2 might get you upwards of 50 or 60 megs, I am guessing.
On Jul 29, 2011 6:54 PM, "Jerry Richardson"
<<mailto:jrichard...@aircloud.com>jrichard...@aircloud.com> wrote:
> OK, now just need to find 40MHz of spectrum. Oh wait, there isn't any....
>
> - Jerry
>
> From:
<mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org>wireless-boun...@wispa.org
[mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Josh Luthman
> Sent: Friday, July 29, 2011 3:52 PM
> To: WISPA General List
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] inexpensive non-2.4/5.8 backhaul ?
>
>
> ARC panel and nv2 in 40mhz?
> On Jul 29, 2011 6:48 PM, "Jerry Richardson"
<<mailto:jrichard...@aircloud.com>jrichard...@aircloud.com<mailto:jrichard...@aircloud.com>>
wrote:
>> What would you use to put together a 100Mbps FDX link for 500 bucks?
>>
>>
>>
>> - Jerry
>>
>> From:
<mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org>wireless-boun...@wispa.org<mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org>
[mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org<mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org>]
On Behalf Of Cameron Crum
>> Sent: Friday, July 29, 2011 12:22 PM
>> To: WISPA General List
>> Subject: Re: [WISPA] inexpensive non-2.4/5.8 backhaul ?
>>
>> Licensed or unlic? If unlic, still no. I can put together an
unlicensed link for for less than $500 that will probably perform
as well as something costing $6000, and for another $500 I could
have redundancy. I'd be a hard sell to get me to pay for something
like that. Maybe I'm just a cheap skate.
>>
>> Cameron
>> On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 2:16 PM, Gino Villarini
<<mailto:g...@aeronetpr.com>g...@aeronetpr.com<mailto:g...@aeronetpr.com><mailto:g...@aeronetpr.com<mailto:g...@aeronetpr.com>>>
wrote:
>> What about below$6k?
>>
>> Gino A. Villarini
>>
<mailto:g...@aeronetpr.com>g...@aeronetpr.com<mailto:g...@aeronetpr.com><mailto:g...@aeronetpr.com<mailto:g...@aeronetpr.com>>
>> Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
>> 787.273.4143<tel:787.273.4143>
>> From:
<mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org>wireless-boun...@wispa.org<mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org><mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org<mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org>>
[mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org<mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org><mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org<mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org>>]
On Behalf Of Cameron Crum
>> Sent: Friday, July 29, 2011 3:11 PM
>>
>> To: WISPA General List
>> Subject: Re: [WISPA] inexpensive non-2.4/5.8 backhaul ?
>>
>> $8000 is expensive to me for an unlicensed frequency. For just
a bit more you can get licensed. If I'm getting out of the $100s
range then I'll bite the bullet and go all the way. The difference
between $8000 and $12000 is not that much if I have to finance the link.
>>
>> Cameron
>> On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 1:59 PM, Gino Villarini
<<mailto:g...@aeronetpr.com>g...@aeronetpr.com<mailto:g...@aeronetpr.com><mailto:g...@aeronetpr.com<mailto:g...@aeronetpr.com>>>
wrote:
>> Yes short hops... whats your price range for "pricey"
>>
>> Gino A. Villarini
>>
<mailto:g...@aeronetpr.com>g...@aeronetpr.com<mailto:g...@aeronetpr.com><mailto:g...@aeronetpr.com<mailto:g...@aeronetpr.com>>
>> Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
>> 787.273.4143<tel:787.273.4143>
>> From:
<mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org>wireless-boun...@wispa.org<mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org><mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org<mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org>>
[mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org<mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org><mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org<mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org>>]
On Behalf Of Cameron Crum
>> Sent: Friday, July 29, 2011 2:58 PM
>>
>> To: WISPA General List
>> Subject: Re: [WISPA] inexpensive non-2.4/5.8 backhaul ?
>>
>> I'm aware of all that, but 24GHz still attenuates fairly
quickly and rain fade will be a problem if you try to go too far.
It would be good for short hops, though. It still seems a bit pricey.
>> On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 1:44 PM, Fred Goldstein
<<mailto:fgoldst...@ionary.com>fgoldst...@ionary.com<mailto:fgoldst...@ionary.com><mailto:fgoldst...@ionary.com<mailto:fgoldst...@ionary.com>>>
wrote:
>> At 7/29/2011 02:38 PM, Cameron Crum wrote:
>> I just assumed if you pay that much for a link it would be in
the licensed band. Still though, I can't imagine too many people
using the unlicensed 24 ghz band, It should be pretty clear, but
if you can't bgo bigger than a 2ft dish, I guess you are pretty limited.
>>
>> Directivity increases with frequency, for a given dish size, so
a 24 GHz 2-foot dish is as directive as a 6 GHz 8-foot dish.
Aiming should be, well, rather fun...
>>
>> But the rules are a little weird, so a bigger antenna would
probably run afoul of the field strength limit. 24 GHz doesn't
specify a power level, but it requires at least a 1-foot dish (33
dB gain) for directivity, and the maximum field strength is 2.5
v/m at 3 meters. I don't offhand know the formula for converting
that to ERP. But the Exalt has a 10 milliwatt (+10 dB) output
which would mean an ERP of around 20 watts with a 1-foot dish.
(Values are from memory, not precise.)
>>
>> Cameron
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 1:24 PM, Gino Villarini
<<mailto:g...@aeronetpr.com>g...@aeronetpr.com<mailto:g...@aeronetpr.com><mailto:g...@aeronetpr.com<mailto:g...@aeronetpr.com>>>
wrote:
>> There are 2 24 ghz blocks available for MW links, one is
unlicensed the other is not
>>
