Radio to Radio testing really isn't a good way to use iperf, part of the 
radio's resources are utilized for running iperf, you should test across the 
radio's not radio to radio. I have a backhaul that is hitting about 70 mbps 
nightly at the moment, it seems to perform well at 70 but I think I've only got 
another 10 (measuring across the link under utilization). I do use Airmax but I 
tend to use it only for loaded links as it keeps a more consistent response 
time when loaded, non-airmax tends to jitter under load, but when not under 
load it works better in my experience. Most of my backhauls are not Airmax 
enabled for this reason.

Regards
Michael Baird

----- Original Message -----
From: "Patrick D. Nix, Jr" <[email protected]>
To: "WISPA General List" <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, October 24, 2011 3:36:14 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: [WISPA] UBNT Rocket M5 Throughput









What is the best real TCP throughput up/down anyone is getting on a PtP ubnt 
connection? We have two rocket M5 approx 1.5 mi, CCQ 97-98%, 40mhz channel 
width, airmax off. 



Displayed TX/RX rate is 270/270. Real TCP throughput via iperf radio to radio 
is 40-45mbps. 



Are there some config changes needed perhaps? 


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Reply via email to