The luxul snake oil worked no better than a 6dbi omni, cost
signifigantly more, and stacked two four port splitters after a two
port splitter. It was a mess.

On 10/25/11, Chuck Hogg <[email protected]> wrote:
> Eric: The whole purpose of this test was to create an omni effect.
> You're talking about something totally different, and I have often
> wondered that as well.  I think there was a company that did this a
> long time ago, Luxul maybe?  You would buy their antenna array..and
> they claimed a lot but nothing materialized out of it AFAIK.
>
> Jim: I don't have the data sheets for them, actually they (my techs)
> assembled everything while I was in Vegas.
>
> We've gone ahead and converted more clients over to it today, and
> speeds/latency are just the same when it was one sector.
>
> Regards,
> Chuck
>
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 4:04 PM, Eric Rogers <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>> I have often wondered if it would be better to have two antennas in one
>> given direction, with one being \ pol and the other antenna being used for
>> /
>> pol.  I wondered if special diversity would allow us to achieve better
>> penetration results to clients without using splitters.
>>
>>
>>
>> Basically order the two of the standard moto antennas, but use one
>> polarity
>> on each.
>>
>>
>>
>> Eric Rogers
>>
>> Precision Data Solutions, LLC
>>
>> (317) 831-3000 x200
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
>> Behalf Of [email protected]
>> Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2011 2:49 PM
>> To: WISPA General List; WISPA General List
>> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Splitters with Motorola Canopy 320 - Results Update
>>
>>
>>
>> You are not really talking a phased array here.  Lengths should not be
>> critical.
>>
>> ----- Reply message -----
>> From: "Josh Luthman" <[email protected]>
>> To: "WISPA General List" <[email protected]>
>> Subject: [WISPA] Splitters with Motorola Canopy 320 - Results Update
>> Date: Tue, Oct 25, 2011 2:39 pm
>>
>>
>> Premades?  Or did you make your own and get as close as humanly possible?
>>
>> Josh Luthman
>> Office: 937-552-2340
>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>> 1100 Wayne St
>> Suite 1337
>> Troy, OH 45373
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 1:55 PM, Chuck Hogg <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> It is my understanding that they need to be of the same length.  That
>>> was our design, all the same length...we used 18" LMR 240 for this
>>> situation.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Chuck
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 1:30 PM, Kristian Hoffmann <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>> Do you have a reference for calculating the proper cable lengths and
>>>> antenna spacing based on frequency when using splitters in a
>>>> configuration like this?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>> -Kristian
>>>>
>>>> On 10/25/2011 06:39 AM, Chuck Hogg wrote:
>>>>> I thought I would post back on here what we did and our results.
>>>>> These are preliminary.
>>>>>
>>>>> Equipment:
>>>>> 1 x 320AP
>>>>>
>>>>> Configuration with only one sector:
>>>>> Power set to 19.9dB (per the manual for legal power settings)
>>>>> AP set to -65 power leveling
>>>>> Client signals at the AP were -65 (or thereabouts, this fluctuates
>>>>> from -65 to -70) for all clients.
>>>>> Client receive levels ranged from -61 to -75.
>>>>>
>>>>> Equipment:
>>>>> 1 x 320AP
>>>>> 4 x 16.5dB 90 degree sectors
>>>>> 2 x 4 way splitters from L-Com
>>>>>
>>>>> Configuration with only one sector:
>>>>> Power set to full 25dB (per the manual for legal power settings,
>>>>> assuming a -6.5dB of loss)
>>>>> AP set to -65 power leveling
>>>>> Client signals at the AP were -65 (or thereabouts, this fluctuates
>>>>> from -65 to -70) for all clients.
>>>>> Client receive levels ranged from -64 to -78.
>>>>>
>>>>> So essentially by adding a 4 way splitter the clients receive levels
>>>>> increased by about 3.5-4dB.  Tower receive levels were unchanged, as
>>>>> most of the clients were power leveled down.  Only one client is
>>>>> transmitting at full power now.  That client is also the highest
>>>>> signal on both sides.  Most client transmit levels are also running at
>>>>> a higher power now as well.
>>>>>
>>>>> Conclusion:
>>>>> I think that running 1 x 320AP x 4 sectors through splitters is a
>>>>> little aggressive.  If the majority of your clients are going to have
>>>>> decent signal levels, then I see no problems with it.  However, I
>>>>> think that our current situation is a little on the edge.  I think
>>>>> that if you are looking for an inexpensive way to use 320AP's, I would
>>>>> recommend this solution.  I think that this solution has a higher net
>>>>> gain over using an 8dB omni.  My results show that it is pretty
>>>>> consistent on being about a total loss of about 8dB using a 4 way
>>>>> splitter.  You can overcome 6.1dB of that loss in turning up the
>>>>> transmit power of the radios.   Your net loss is about 2.5-3dB,
>>>>> however you are able to focus the sectors a little better.
>>>>>
>>>>> In the long run on future deployments, we will likely use 2 AP's and 4
>>>>> sectors with 4x2way splitters (MIMO).  Once they reach capacity, we'll
>>>>> add additional AP's.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> Chuck
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
>>>>> http://signup.wispa.org/
>>>>>
>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>
>>>>> WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]
>>>>>
>>>>> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
>>>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>>>>
>>>>> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Kristian Hoffmann
>>>> System Administrator
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> http://www.fire2wire.com
>>>>
>>>> Office - 209-543-1800 | Fax - 209-545-1469 | Toll Free - 800-905-FIRE
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
>>>> http://signup.wispa.org/
>>>>
>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>> WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]
>>>>
>>>> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
>>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>>>
>>>> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
>>> http://signup.wispa.org/
>>>
>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>> WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]
>>>
>>> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>>
>>> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>>>
>>
>>
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
>> http://signup.wispa.org/
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]
>>
>> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>
>> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>>
>>
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
>> http://signup.wispa.org/
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]
>>
>> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>
>> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> http://signup.wispa.org/
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>

-- 
Sent from my mobile device


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Reply via email to