I think we would like the Cisco better as well… however I don’t believe they can bridge for the pppoe passthrough. If they can then we will re-evaluate.
Kevin From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Blake Covarrubias Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 2011 5:09 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] Cable CMTS We have an older C9...one of the first models I believe. We had issues with it & have since replaced it with a refurbished Cisco uBR7200. We like the Cisco much better. -- Blake Covarrubias On Nov 8, 2011, at 14:49, Kevin Owen <ko...@fsr.com<mailto:ko...@fsr.com>> wrote: We are expanding our cable internet markets by acquisition. We are currently using C9 CMTS’s at the head end in each community. We chose these since we need to be able to bridge PPPoE for authentication. None of the communities are very large so we don’t need high customer count capabilities on the CMTS, what we do need is bridging. Is anybody using a small CMTS for their cable internet services other than a C9? We would be interested in exploring other options. Thanks, Kevin -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org<mailto:wireless@wispa.org> Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
