Any way you look at it, the UBNT 24Ghz product is a game changer. Its 
bringing a price point, that will mass excellerate the adoption of 24Ghz 
use.
At that price, there are 1000s of uses.  Its very exciting. Its also a big 
bonus that it is MIMO, which should give it a good link budget, compared to 
the methods other technologies use to accommodate dual pol.

What I dont like about it is that it uses to much spectrum and is to fast, 
which will cause parties to deploy faster speeds than they need, simply 
because they can, and cause more interference in urban areas, and reduce the 
number of links in an area. Often people incorrectly think that millimeter 
is like inteference free. What they forget is the low range is based on Rain 
fade, but when its not raining the signal goes very far, and reflections can 
reflect all over the place, even though narrow beamwidth.

But there will still be a strong market for other products like SAF.  For 
example, windloading and mounting.  I jsut bought a SAF radio for that 
reason, where the 1ft dish option was preferred.
SAF also has 256QAM support, quite a bit more efficient than UBNT's 64QAM 
limit, allowing high speed in smaller channels, allowing more radios to be 
colocated at a single site.

I think UBNT's marketing is their typical overstated marketing.. Just like 
AIRMAX 5.8 where they promote as 300mb, when in reallity Dual Pol 20Mhz 
channels, the common size that can be used, yields more like between 40mb 
and 80mb depending on link budget and noise floor.  So in doing apples to 
apples comparisons, its important to take that into consideration. For 
example, a 13mile link just isn't going to happen in my rain zone, but might 
be doable in the desert.  With 2ft dishes, I dare not go over 2-1/4 miles, 
and still prefer under 1.5m.

I believe the UBNT 24 product will also put a hurting on the 60Ghz market.


Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband

_______________________________________________
Wireless mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Reply via email to