this is actually inside a structure not on top… but I guess that still applies…
Thanks, Chris On Aug 22, 2012, at 12:42 PM, Matt Hoppes <[email protected]> wrote: > Yes, > They can contract that with the building/tower owner. All it means is > if you want to go on the tower you can't use those frequencies. You can > erect a structure on the next available land plot and use them. > > > Matt Hoppes > Director of Information Technology > Indigo Wireless > +1 (570) 723-7312 > > On 8/22/12 12:38 PM, Chris Stradtman wrote: >> Folks, >> >> I'm dealing with a situation in a structure where an incumbent cell >> carrier is claiming full control of the >> RF spectrum (if I understand correctly from 3 kHz >> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/KHz> to 300 GHz >> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gigahertz>). This claim is based on a >> contract with >> the buildings management company. Currently they are not offering any >> services in the ISM or UNII ranges, >> however they claim that no other vendor can offer services in that range >> without the express permission ( >> and a healthy chunk of all the revenues). Has anybody dealt with this >> before?? I realize that they are probably (one of) the >> license holder(s) on record for the regulated cellular spectrum, but I >> wonder if a contract with the venue can actually override >> the FCCs licensing ( or lack thereof ) on the ISM and UNII spectrums space? >> >> Anybody have any wisdom on this ?? >> >> Thanks, >> >> Chris >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Wireless mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless >> > _______________________________________________ > Wireless mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless _______________________________________________ Wireless mailing list [email protected] http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
