I think it would be really tough for them to accomplish them, being atheros
and all.  Most you get is athstats.

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373


On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 5:50 PM, Doug Clark <[email protected]> wrote:

>     I was just compiling them, BUT the simple answer is Joshs'
> They could do most of it in AirControl.
>
>
>
>
>  *-------Original Message-------*
>
>  *From:* Josh Luthman <[email protected]>
> *Date:* 9/23/2012 3:49:54 PM
> *To:* WISPA General List <[email protected]>
> *Subject:* Re: [WISPA] which one is better for short links?
>
> The amazing stats you get from a Moto PTP.
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340
> Direct: 937-552-2343
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
>
>
> On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 5:46 PM, Jon Auer <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> What would you like them to add for monitoring and troubleshooting?
>  On Sep 23, 2012 4:22 PM, "Doug Clark" <[email protected]> wrote:
>     +1 on the fact that radio's should only be a transparent bridge.  I
> do love all the features that some manufacturers give you to trouble shoot
> problems though.
> UBNT is not one of those companies.......  They lack a lot when it comes
> to trouble shooting and monitoring the link!!
>
>
>
>
> *-------Original Message-------*
>
>  *From:* Fred Goldstein <[email protected]>
> *Date:* 9/23/2012 9:43:40 AM
> *To:* WISPA General List <[email protected]>;  WISPA General 
> List<[email protected]>
> *Subject:* Re: [WISPA] which one is better for short links?
>
> At 9/23/2012 06:17 AM, Paolo Di Francesco wrote:
> >Hi All,
> >
> >I have noticed that lately many collegues are using Ubiquiti Nanobridge
> >M5 (the one with small parabolic dish) and the product is nice for the
> >signal (more or less).
> >
> >Unfortunately, I do not see in the *same price range*, the same product
> >from Mikrotik. The only thing that I see is "SEXTANT 5HnD" which is
> >declared to be 18dBi (much less that the 23dBi DECLARED by Ubiquiti)
>
> Antenna gain is almost entirely a function of size; with a dish, it's
> pretty straightforward.  The NM5 has 326 and 400 mm dish versions,
> for 22 and 25 dB nominal gain.  The Sextant is 250 mm; the SXT is 140
> mm.  Smaller dishes means less directivity and lower gain, but also
> less wind load and visibility.  Neither one is "better" in that
> regard; they're just different.  And they tend to price out a bit
> better than buying a radio and dish separately, but not by much.
>
> >What I do not like of Ubiquiti is that compared to mikrotik it has much
> >less features, for example no mac-ping/mac-telnet or multiple SSID (ok
> >you can have multiple SSID if you use the CLI and the linux command line
> >and maybe it will be implemented in the future)
> >
> >Therefore, I really wonder if those 18 vs 23 are real or just what you
> >think from your field experience.
>
> Those features are just software and have nothing to do with the gain
> of the antenna.  It's like comparing horsepower of a car's engine
> with the comfort of the seats.  Personally I don't think the radio
> unit itself should do more than pass along Ethernet frames
> transparently, and respond to management, but since everybody's
> working from a Linux kernel and that already has lots of other
> capabilities, people expect their radios to also be routers.
>
>
>   --
>   Fred Goldstein    k1io   fgoldstein "at" ionary.com
>   ionary Consulting              http://www.ionary.com/
>   +1 617 795 2701
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wireless mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wireless mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wireless mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wireless mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wireless mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
>
_______________________________________________
Wireless mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Reply via email to