Nanobridge25's, 30mhz channel, DFS, moves high 90's.
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 10:31 AM, Andy Trimmell <[email protected]> wrote: > For shear cost effectiveness I'd agree with Josh. You're going to be falling > a bit short of 50Mbps full duplex if you go with Rocket gear. > > > > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On > Behalf Of Josh Luthman > Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2013 1:14 PM > To: [email protected] > Cc: WISPA General List; [email protected] > Subject: Re: [WISPA] [WUG] Short UBNT PTP link > > > > Ubnt at 20 MHz will get you at most 80 megs aggregate. If you need 50 fdx > you're falling short. > > > > If you're using 3.65 I'm not sure what your other options would be, Redline > is more carrier grade but I'm not sure of the bandwidth. Depending on the > price of carrier grade stuff it might just be easier to do AirFiber. > > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > > > > On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 1:12 PM, Sean Heskett <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Gang, > > > > I am looking at installing a short (100m) PTP backhaul across a campground > for a wifi system we are putting in. I'm looking at using a pair of UBNT > NSM365 units to accomplish this. I need about 50Mbps full duplex. I'd like > to use the 3.65Ghz spectrum for this PTP so that i keep all my other part15 > spectrum clean. > > > > Is this the best option or do you have another recommendation. > > > > I'm a bit new to UBNT and not completely familiar with the product line. > > > > Thanks for your help. > > > > -sean > > > > > ----------------------------------------------- > Wireless Users Group [email protected] > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Wireless mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > _______________________________________________ Wireless mailing list [email protected] http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
