—
Sent from Mailbox for iPhone
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "timothy steele" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 9:17 AM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Fight to keep 365 Dec 11
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, "Principal WISPA Member List"
<[email protected]>
> The PDF makes it look like The FCC is giving it to the cell company's tho..
> Anyone have more info?
> —
> Sent from Mailbox for iPhone
> On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 9:00 AM, George Skorup (Cyber Broadcasting)
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> I don't see it as losing it. They'll have to grandfather existing and
>> deployed equipment, at least for a few years. There's no way they'd be
>> able to enforce a shutdown/take-down order.
>> If we want 3550-3650, then we (and manufacturers) will have to submit to
>> this geolocation database shared spectrum access idea like TVWS. If the
>> rules get simplified, like getting rid of the CPE registration and the
>> stupid restricted/non-restricted band split, good. I read the WiMax
>> forum slides and this is pretty much what they're saying, too.
>> On 11/4/2013 5:36 AM, timothy steele wrote:
>>> Repost from "other forums"
>>>
>>> Your comments are needed on this proceeding. Especially, the FCC wants
>>> to know about adding the current 3.65 band to this proposed 3.5 band
>>> and ELIMINATING the current 3.65 setup and systems that are using it
>>> NOW !!!!
>>>
>>> **
>>>
>>> *GN Docket No. 12-354*
>>>
>>> If you currently have 3.65 licensed equipment or a system up and
>>> running, you have the possiblity of LOSING IT !!!
>>>
>>>
>>> http://community.ubnt.com/t5/Business-Talk/FCC-3-5-proceeding-comment-needed-or-possible-3-65-band-is-GONE/m-p/614551#U614551
>>>
>>>
>>> https://www.google.com/search?as_q=fcc+GN+Docket+No.+12-354
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> —
>>> Sent from Mailbox <https://www.dropbox.com/mailbox> for iPhone
_______________________________________________
Wireless mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
