Why would you bid $1 , if you wanted to lock the area. You would have build out 
already?

Sent from my Motorola Startac... 


> On Jul 31, 2014, at 7:26 PM, "Josh Reynolds" <j...@spitwspots.com> wrote:
> 
> Deployed to.
> 
> The whole thing sounds like a freaking play to the cable cos (imagine that).
> 
> From my understanding, if you were a very large provider and wanted to 
> maintain market-share and not let a competitor build out in your area 
> with federal funding, you could submit a bid for the competitor's 
> proposed market (and a bit more) for freaking $1 for the entire project. 
> You *would* have to have the whole project bankrolled by your company, 
> and done in something like 18 months I believe... but you would 
> theoretically "win the bid" (which conveniently, amounts bidded and 
> received are never announced).
> 
> The bid submission system is 100% automated, from the way they described it.
> 
> Josh Reynolds, CIO
> SPITwSPOTS
> www.spitwspots.com
> 
>> On 07/31/2014 03:10 PM, Gino Villarini wrote:
>> So I have been reading on this topic lately
>> 
>> On the financial side the FCC is going to fund for 10 years on monthly 
>> installments what?
>> 
>> All the locations on a high cost census track that you deployed or the ones 
>> that actually subscribe?
>> 
>> Sent from my Motorola Startac...
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wireless mailing list
>> Wireless@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Wireless mailing list
> Wireless@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
_______________________________________________
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Reply via email to