Why would you bid $1 , if you wanted to lock the area. You would have build out already?
Sent from my Motorola Startac... > On Jul 31, 2014, at 7:26 PM, "Josh Reynolds" <j...@spitwspots.com> wrote: > > Deployed to. > > The whole thing sounds like a freaking play to the cable cos (imagine that). > > From my understanding, if you were a very large provider and wanted to > maintain market-share and not let a competitor build out in your area > with federal funding, you could submit a bid for the competitor's > proposed market (and a bit more) for freaking $1 for the entire project. > You *would* have to have the whole project bankrolled by your company, > and done in something like 18 months I believe... but you would > theoretically "win the bid" (which conveniently, amounts bidded and > received are never announced). > > The bid submission system is 100% automated, from the way they described it. > > Josh Reynolds, CIO > SPITwSPOTS > www.spitwspots.com > >> On 07/31/2014 03:10 PM, Gino Villarini wrote: >> So I have been reading on this topic lately >> >> On the financial side the FCC is going to fund for 10 years on monthly >> installments what? >> >> All the locations on a high cost census track that you deployed or the ones >> that actually subscribe? >> >> Sent from my Motorola Startac... >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Wireless mailing list >> Wireless@wispa.org >> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > > _______________________________________________ > Wireless mailing list > Wireless@wispa.org > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless _______________________________________________ Wireless mailing list Wireless@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless