KPP if for nothing else it comes with better jumpers. KPP has N connectors on antenna and jumper to match up to RP-SMA on Rocket. YMMV
-Matt From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Josh Luthman Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2014 12:23 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] KP Performance vs UBNT Antennas Same radios but I had the opposite experience. I had one at -35, maybe the RF armor requires both of those dumb machine screws to work. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 12:09 PM, Greg Osborn <gregwosb...@gmail.com <mailto:gregwosb...@gmail.com> > wrote: UBNT to KPP straight up, kpp. UBNT with armor vs KPP, we prefer UBNT because of the extra horizontal separation required with KPP. On a grainleg platform, we've seen kpp sectors see one another at -30 or below, where UBNT see one another in the -50's. On a tower without standoffs and KPP, forget it, you will have problems. 2.4 in 10mhz cw. -----Original Message----- From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org <mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org> [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org <mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org> ] On Behalf Of Mathew Howard Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2014 11:33 AM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] KP Performance vs UBNT Antennas one obvious advantage with the KPP is that the connectors or all covered by the shielding, so you eliminate any potential issues with water in the connectors, and you can throw away that annoying cover on the Rocket over the ethernet port. ________________________________________ From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org <mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org> [wireless-boun...@wispa.org <mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org> ] on behalf of Sam [w...@csilogan.com <mailto:w...@csilogan.com> ] Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2014 10:07 AM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] KP Performance vs UBNT Antennas Mathew, these are for 2. GHz Rockets. I was wondering about the shielding as well. Unless you're in an area with a ton of interference... But as was mentioned, the KP omni with the shielding is the same price basically as the same UBNT model without it. I'm all about using stuff that's included at no additional charge :) On 8/28/2014 10:00, Mathew Howard wrote: > I haven't used any KPP omnis, but I have used several different brands of dual polarity omnis and I haven't really seen any notable difference in performance between any of them. > > Are you looking at 2.4ghz or 5ghz? > > Is there really a lot of benefit to shielding the radio with an omni? it seems somewhat pointless to me... > ________________________________________ > From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org <mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org> > [wireless-boun...@wispa.org <mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org> ] on > behalf of Sam [w...@csilogan.com <mailto:w...@csilogan.com> ] > Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2014 9:29 AM > To: WISPA General List > Subject: Re: [WISPA] KP Performance vs UBNT Antennas > > That's a great point. Thank you Andy. How about differences in > performance between the two? Big difference? Negligible? > > Thanks > Sam > > > > On 8/28/2014 09:18, Andy Trimmell wrote: >> I think the big plus with the KP antennas is they come with a cover >> for the rocket. You'll have to buy a RF Elements cover if you're >> using stock Rockets with stock UBNT antennas. >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org <mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org> >> [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org <mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org> ] >> On Behalf Of Sam >> Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2014 9:29 AM >> To: WISPA General List >> Subject: [WISPA] KP Performance vs UBNT Antennas >> >> I am hoping to find someone who has used both UBNT and KP Performance >> antennas (with Rockets) who would be willing to share their >> experiences of one vs the other. For this project I'm specifically >> looking at 13 dBi omni antennas, but am curious about how the sector >> antennas compare as well. >> >> Thanks >> Sam >> _______________________________________________ >> Wireless mailing list >> Wireless@wispa.org <mailto:Wireless@wispa.org> >> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless >> _______________________________________________ >> Wireless mailing list >> Wireless@wispa.org <mailto:Wireless@wispa.org> >> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless >> > > _______________________________________________ > Wireless mailing list > Wireless@wispa.org <mailto:Wireless@wispa.org> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > > _______________________________________________ > Wireless mailing list > Wireless@wispa.org <mailto:Wireless@wispa.org> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > _______________________________________________ Wireless mailing list Wireless@wispa.org <mailto:Wireless@wispa.org> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless _______________________________________________ Wireless mailing list Wireless@wispa.org <mailto:Wireless@wispa.org> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless _______________________________________________ Wireless mailing list Wireless@wispa.org <mailto:Wireless@wispa.org> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
_______________________________________________ Wireless mailing list Wireless@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless