It can happen. I recommend using maybe an omni for the VERY close in customers 
or a second 'radio layer' for the close in...Like 50'-1500'

Jon Langeler
Michwave Technologies, Inc.


> On Mar 21, 2017, at 1:38 PM, Mike Hammett <wispawirel...@ics-il.net> wrote:
> 
> Client on east AP interfering with west AP.
> 
> 
> 
> -----
> Mike Hammett
> 
> Intelligent Computing Solutions
> 
> 
> Midwest Internet Exchange
> 
> 
> The Brothers WISP
> 
> From: "Josh Luthman" <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com>
> To: "WISPA General List" <wireless@wispa.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2017 11:45:14 AM
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Cambium 450, 450m, and epmp in 5.X GHz Comparison
> 
> But they'll listen at the same time, too, from CPEs on the other AP.
> 
> 
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340
> Direct: 937-552-2343
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
> 
>> On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 12:38 PM, Seth Mattinen <se...@rollernet.us> wrote:
>> On 3/21/17 09:31, Marco Coelho wrote:
>> > Those using the 450m, are you having to put anything behind the to
>> > increase the F/B ratio instead of physical separation?
>> >
>> 
>> 
>> The sectors hearing each other isn't really an issue with GPS sync since
>> they will all TX at the same time.
>> 
>> ~Seth
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wireless mailing list
>> Wireless@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Wireless mailing list
> Wireless@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Wireless mailing list
> Wireless@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
_______________________________________________
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Reply via email to