It can happen. I recommend using maybe an omni for the VERY close in customers or a second 'radio layer' for the close in...Like 50'-1500'
Jon Langeler Michwave Technologies, Inc. > On Mar 21, 2017, at 1:38 PM, Mike Hammett <wispawirel...@ics-il.net> wrote: > > Client on east AP interfering with west AP. > > > > ----- > Mike Hammett > > Intelligent Computing Solutions > > > Midwest Internet Exchange > > > The Brothers WISP > > From: "Josh Luthman" <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> > To: "WISPA General List" <firstname.lastname@example.org> > Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2017 11:45:14 AM > Subject: Re: [WISPA] Cambium 450, 450m, and epmp in 5.X GHz Comparison > > But they'll listen at the same time, too, from CPEs on the other AP. > > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > >> On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 12:38 PM, Seth Mattinen <se...@rollernet.us> wrote: >> On 3/21/17 09:31, Marco Coelho wrote: >> > Those using the 450m, are you having to put anything behind the to >> > increase the F/B ratio instead of physical separation? >> > >> >> >> The sectors hearing each other isn't really an issue with GPS sync since >> they will all TX at the same time. >> >> ~Seth >> _______________________________________________ >> Wireless mailing list >> Wireless@wispa.org >> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > > > _______________________________________________ > Wireless mailing list > Wireless@wispa.org > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > > _______________________________________________ > Wireless mailing list > Wireless@wispa.org > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
_______________________________________________ Wireless mailing list Wireless@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless