We don’t see issues with F/B interference with 450 very often in 5.7 but it’s 
much more significant in 3.65.  Typical issue will be poor SNR for the close-in 
customers even though they have excellent signal.

Mark

> On Mar 21, 2017, at 2:00 PM, Jon Langeler <jon-ispli...@michwave.net> wrote:
> 
> It can happen. I recommend using maybe an omni for the VERY close in 
> customers or a second 'radio layer' for the close in...Like 50'-1500'
> 
> Jon Langeler
> Michwave Technologies, Inc.
> 
> 
> On Mar 21, 2017, at 1:38 PM, Mike Hammett <wispawirel...@ics-il.net 
> <mailto:wispawirel...@ics-il.net>> wrote:
> 
>> Client on east AP interfering with west AP.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -----
>> Mike Hammett
>> 
>> Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/>
>>  <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> 
>> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> 
>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> 
>> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
>> 
>> Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/>
>>  <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix> 
>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange> 
>> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix>
>> 
>> The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/>
>>  <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp> 
>> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg>
>> From: "Josh Luthman" <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com 
>> <mailto:j...@imaginenetworksllc.com>>
>> To: "WISPA General List" <wireless@wispa.org <mailto:wireless@wispa.org>>
>> Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2017 11:45:14 AM
>> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Cambium 450, 450m, and epmp in 5.X GHz Comparison
>> 
>> But they'll listen at the same time, too, from CPEs on the other AP.
>> 
>> 
>> Josh Luthman
>> Office: 937-552-2340
>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>> 1100 Wayne St
>> Suite 1337
>> Troy, OH 45373
>> 
>> On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 12:38 PM, Seth Mattinen <se...@rollernet.us 
>> <mailto:se...@rollernet.us>> wrote:
>> On 3/21/17 09:31, Marco Coelho wrote:
>> > Those using the 450m, are you having to put anything behind the to
>> > increase the F/B ratio instead of physical separation?
>> >
>> 
>> 
>> The sectors hearing each other isn't really an issue with GPS sync since
>> they will all TX at the same time.
>> 
>> ~Seth
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wireless mailing list
>> Wireless@wispa.org <mailto:Wireless@wispa.org>
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 
>> <http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless>
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wireless mailing list
>> Wireless@wispa.org <mailto:Wireless@wispa.org>
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 
>> <http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless>
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wireless mailing list
>> Wireless@wispa.org <mailto:Wireless@wispa.org>
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 
>> <http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless>
> _______________________________________________
> Wireless mailing list
> Wireless@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

_______________________________________________
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Reply via email to