https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11355
--- Comment #12 from Guy Harris <g...@alum.mit.edu> ---
(In reply to Christopher Maynard from comment #11)
> (In reply to Guy Harris from comment #9)
> > For what it's worth, I tried it with Wireshark 2.6.6, still built with Qt
> > 5.3.2, on macOS 10.13.6, and didn't seem to see the problem. I don't know
> > whether that's just luck or whether later versions of macOS made changes
> > that caused the problem to go away.
>
> In light of this though, maybe it can be closed anyway without necessarily
> dropping support for Snow Leopard by requiring a newer version of Qt yet?
> Unless you'd prefer to drop support for Snow Leopard regardless?
It could just be luck, or it could be that it still has a problem on, for
example, Mountain Lion, so I wouldn't just say "no longer a problem".
And I think at least one user has complained about the lack of Dark Mode
support in Mojave, so upgrading to a newer version of Qt might be a good idea,
even if it means we drop support for Snow Leopard.
The question is what post-5.3.2 versions of Qt can be used in applications to
be deployed on what post-Snow Leopard versions of macOS?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via: Wireshark-bugs mailing list <wireshark-bugs@wireshark.org>
Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs
mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
