https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11743
--- Comment #19 from Joel Holdsworth <j...@airwebreathe.org.uk> ---
I just tested your new patches. It's now beginning to decode the TX packets
quite nicely.
As I'm sure you're aware, you still don't have disection of the "Set Data bits
LowByte" and "HighByte" fields (these labels are a bit ugly), but this should
be very simple to implement.
One minor issue: I had to mark the "tree" parameter of
"estimated_command_parameters_length" as unused to prevent a compiler error.
Anyway... the code is still quite simple, and yet it's good enough for me to
reverse engineer the functionality of the software I'm trying to replicate.
Nice work.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via: Wireshark-bugs mailing list <wireshark-bugs@wireshark.org>
Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs
mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
