https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16538
--- Comment #2 from Matthew Weant <mswe...@hotmail.com> ---
(In reply to Pascal Quantin from comment #1)
> Hi Matthew,
>
> could you clarify your request? As far as I know all the
> dissect_e212_mcc_mnc_XXX() function put first the MCC then the MNC in the
> tree.
> Given that the E.212 specification does not use the label representation
> where the MNC is put before the MCC, I do not see why packet-e212.c would be
> involved.
Oops. You're correct. packet-e212.c correctly presents MCC then MNC. I think
the issue mostly lies with dissectors that parse NAI Realm or Domain Name
strings where the MNC value comes before the MCC value, so they are posted to
the tree in reverse order.
Example: wlan.mnc###.mcc###.3gppnetwork.org
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via: Wireshark-bugs mailing list <wireshark-bugs@wireshark.org>
Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs
mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
