https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16656
--- Comment #6 from Guy Harris <ghar...@sonic.net> ---
(In reply to Guy Harris from comment #5)
> (In reply to Guy Harris from comment #4)
> > What's an example of the format you want? Show an example with two packets.
>
> In particular, is it just "ek without the index rows", in which case
> "ek-noindices" might be the right name to use as the -T argument.
Your comment in the ask.wireshark.org question
> Well as you may know the regular json output returns an array of json objects.
> Therefore in order to parse that array it has to be completed (with the
> trailing
> ]) which is added once the capture is completed (pressing ctrl-c for example)
>
> For continuos captures such as real time streaming I can't parse the array
> because it is never completed (unless I do some hack), therefore one json
> row for each packet is the more portable way to retrieve this data.
so that's at least similar to "ek without the index rows".
Would that suffice?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via: Wireshark-bugs mailing list <wireshark-bugs@wireshark.org>
Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs
mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
