https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5279
--- Comment #6 from Chris Maynard <christopher.mayn...@gtech.com> 2010-10-06 11:17:44 PDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > Currently mark/unmark all packets actually means mark/unmark all displayed > packets. I think we best keep it that way. > Actually, it doesn't. "Unmark all packets" really does unmark *ALL* packets, whether they are displayed or not. Currently there is no option to only unmark all displayed packets and to leave the non-displayed marked packets alone. I think this makes it rather confusing because there's no complement to "Mark all displayed packets", although I think maybe that was the intent of the "Mark All Displayed Packets (toggle)" option, except that doesn't really do what you would think it would do. > I would vote for just adding "Invert Marking of Displayed Packets" > > With all of the above one can do all marking/unmarking and inverting of marks > of *ALL* packets by just removing the display filter. > > But that's my vote, others might vote for adding 4 more marking options > instead > of 1. Whichever way yields the best overall functionality and so long as it's clear and unambiguous as to how the packets will be marked/unmarked and to which set (displayed or not) it will apply. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-bugs mailing list <wireshark-bugs@wireshark.org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
