https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5621
Cal Turney <turney_...@emc.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |turney_...@emc.com --- Comment #4 from Cal Turney <turney_...@emc.com> 2011-01-31 14:27:16 PST --- (In reply to comment #3) > Committed revision 35718. > It would be nice to higlight the matching data when doing filtering too. Hi Anders, I thought of that too but what if there are multiple filters? It could get a bit messy because you'd have to decide which fields to highlight. The folks in my group are interested in being able to optionally search recursively within the same frame. This would be especially useful in cases where TCP reassembly is enabled and the PDUs are very large. Such a feature could be made available for Hex Value, String in Packet data, and String in Packet decode searches. A "Search recursively" (or some such) checkbox could be added to the Find dialog. Sound interesting? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-bugs mailing list <wireshark-bugs@wireshark.org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe