https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12067
--- Comment #14 from Matt Day <fja...@gmail.com> --- (In reply to Gerald Combs from comment #12) > (In reply to Gerald Combs from comment #11) > > (In reply to Matt Day from comment #8) > > > It seems nobody has tested Wireshark+Qt5 much beyond successful > > > compilation. > > > > Are you referring to the official packages from wireshark.org or the > > homebrew-compiled executables? > > Note that I'm not trying to be snarky here. The official Wireshark packages > for macOS are compiled with versions of Qt, GLib, and other libraries that > don't change very often and are known to work reasonably well. The Wireshark > application is installed as an application bundle and *not* as a bare > executable. The further homebrew diverges from the wireshark.org installer > the more opportunities for misadventure will arise. That's an excellent point, and not snarky at all. Thanks! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-bugs mailing list <wireshark-bugs@wireshark.org> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
