https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12855
--- Comment #6 from Pascal Quantin <pascal.quan...@gmail.com> --- For both cases, 2.0.5 behavior seems better (as discussed in Gerrit I'm not a fan of the reassembly happening despite missing packets). Maybe that's why previous code was not simple ;) IMHO the Follow TCP stream feature should not rely on the upper dissector having TCP reassembly activated / supported or not. Not sure how to move forward. Obviously the current handling needs more work, and the previous code was working fine for those use cases. Should we revert the change until a more solid version is available? Michael, what's your opinion? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-bugs mailing list <wireshark-bugs@wireshark.org> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
