https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12847
--- Comment #1 from Martin Kacer <kacer.mar...@gmail.com> --- Currently it was designed in this way. There is the exact match function in the code. So it is required to include all parent fields in -j filter which should be included in the output. Previously during development there was the substring comparison function which worked in similar way as the proposed behavior. But the exact match function seems to be better to reduce the size of the output. The filtered nodes (e.g. <field name="filtered" value="radiotap.flags" />) can be added into -j filter (by adding radiotap.flags). But suggestions are welcomed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-bugs mailing list <wireshark-bugs@wireshark.org> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
