https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12759
Michael Mann <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |CONFIRMED CC| |[email protected] Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #7 from Michael Mann <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Guy Harris from comment #5) > Section 6, "Link Layer Protocol Specification", of G.9952, appears to > document the protocol in question. See > > http://www.itu.int/ITU-T/recommendations/rec.aspx?rec=8519 I used this more so than Stig's Lua dissector for https://code.wireshark.org/review/19187, but then Stig's provided capture is malformed because the length field is incorrect. I started of with a preference for short versus long format, but it seems like it can be derived (based on type), so I dropped the preference. However, I can't find a scenario where the provided capture has a proper length field based on the spec noted above. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-bugs mailing list <[email protected]> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
