https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2874

Guy Harris <g...@alum.mit.edu> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|RESOLVED                    |CONFIRMED
         Resolution|FIXED                       |---

--- Comment #6 from Guy Harris <g...@alum.mit.edu> ---
Somebody still doesn't like it:

   
https://ask.wireshark.org/questions/62677/tshark-l-does-not-function-force-tshark-realtime

If the overhead for "displaying" a batch of N packets is a linear function of
N, my guess is that the constant term for Wireshark is significant and the
constant term for TShark is small, so increasing the batch size may make a
significant difference to Wireshark but a small difference to TShark
(increasing the batch size reduces the contribution of the constant term, which
matters only if the constant term is significant), so maybe the batching is
necessary only for Wireshark.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
You are the assignee for the bug.
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-bugs mailing list <wireshark-bugs@wireshark.org>
Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs
             mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

Reply via email to