https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11630

--- Comment #29 from jewgenij.bytsch...@t-systems.com ---
(In reply to João Valverde from comment #27)
> It would help to know if the scope is strictly Juniper 242.
> Should the new preference eventually include also 243 ("Ascend-Call-Filer")
> for instance?

The issue reported in this bug case concerns only the old attr 242
Ascend-Data-Filter (= extended types 242.1 and 242.3 as they are interpreted
according to the RFC 6929), not the old attr 243 Ascend-Call-Filter. So the
scope is strictly the old RADIUS attribute 242 Ascend-Data-Filter which is
widely used by Juniper and Ericsson/Redback access routers. Juniper and
Ericsson/Redback do not really need the attr 243 (Ascend-Call-Filter) to be
provided by Radius. At least, I have never seen Ascend-Call-Filter or other
Ascend-related legacy attributes excluding ADF.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-bugs mailing list <wireshark-bugs@wireshark.org>
Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs
             mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

Reply via email to