https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13926

--- Comment #15 from Pascal Quantin <pascal.quan...@gmail.com> ---
(In reply to conall.prendergast from comment #14)
> I think it would be possible to use the calling address, as this will never
> change. The only thing that could change is the called address through the
> GT translation.

Unless I'm mistaken, the calling address becomes the called address for a
message in the other direction. And you need to figure out the direction
programatically.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-bugs mailing list <wireshark-bugs@wireshark.org>
Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs
             mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

Reply via email to