https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14241
--- Comment #14 from Garri <g.djavad...@gmail.com> ---
(In reply to Alexis La Goutte from comment #13)
> or need to add preference to force a capability...
Maybe Wireshark could use some heuristics. For example, it could try to dissect
an NLRI as ordinary NLRI and check if it see a next path attribute (known to
Wireshark) or an end of Update message _correctly_. If it would fail - try to
dissect as PathID prefixed NLRI. Just an idea. Thanks.
(In reply to Michael Mann from comment #2)
> The issue is with packet 6 in the supplied capture. Just playing around, I
> modified tvb_get_ipv6_addr_with_prefix_len() and removed the handling of
> prefix values not divisible by 8 (non full bytes), and the packet dissected
> correctly.
A prefix length could be 68 bits, for example. It would use 9 bytes for an
address length in NLRI field.
P.S.: I could provide any BGP conversations related to AddPath capability, if
needed.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via: Wireshark-bugs mailing list <wireshark-bugs@wireshark.org>
Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs
mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
