https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14266
--- Comment #16 from Guy Harris <[email protected]> ---
(In reply to zpchi004 from comment #15)
> So wireshark displays a) and b) correctly. c) and d) are wrong.
I.e., it gets it wrong in two cases where the radiotap flag bit is true.
> So wireshark displays a), b) and d) correctly. c) is wrong.
I.e., it gets it right in a case where the radiotap flag bit is false and gets
it wrong where the radiotap flag is true.
So there's *something* wrong that happens with a radiotap flag that's true -
but it doesn't *always* happen; it requires that there be other packets, of
some unknown sort, in the file.
What happens if you write out a file that includes the offending packet and all
the packets before it, but doesn't include any of the packets after it, and
then read that file? (You should be able to do that by saving a range of
packets starting with 1 and ending with the offending packet.)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via: Wireshark-bugs mailing list <[email protected]>
Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs
mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
