https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14345
--- Comment #2 from Ralph <ralph.schmie...@gmail.com> ---
No. According to Guy on wireshark-users:
> And the actual issue is in the low-level code (*very* low-level code) in
> libwiretap that TShark uses to read the capture; that code isn't using the
> "standard I/O" libraries, so stdbuf won't affect it. Even if curl *isn't*
> buffering its output, TShark, in effect, reads it as if it were buffered.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via: Wireshark-bugs mailing list <wireshark-bugs@wireshark.org>
Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs
mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
