https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14497

--- Comment #1 from Guy Harris <g...@alum.mit.edu> ---
Crash in the lookup helper, closing its side of the pipe, so we get a SIGPIPE
writing to it?  We should probably ignore SIGPIPE in Wireshark, but we probably
don't want to do so in TShark, as it's the standard way of sending a "terminate
this pipeline" indication up the pipeline if you ^C the command. 
Unfortunately, I don't see a broadly-portable way to say "I can haz no
SIGPIPE?"

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-bugs mailing list <wireshark-bugs@wireshark.org>
Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs
             mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

Reply via email to