--- Comment #8 from Harald Welte <lafo...@gnumonks.org> ---
I've pushed https://code.wireshark.org/review/26797 as a possible fix. It's
fairly trivial, but it feels quite wrong to call a "gsm_a_ccch" dissector with
something that clearly is transportetd over the downlink SACCH and not over the
As dissect_ccch() comments state: "The name CCCH might not be correct!"
So in reality, what dissect_ccch() is, is a RR dissector for the "information
field of LAPDm B4 and Bbis frames". Maybe it should be renamed? But then, we'd
change the name for register_dissector and would have to rename this in various
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
Sent via: Wireshark-bugs mailing list <email@example.com>