https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14105

--- Comment #8 from Harald Welte <lafo...@gnumonks.org> ---
I've pushed https://code.wireshark.org/review/26797 as a possible fix.  It's
fairly trivial, but it feels quite wrong to call a "gsm_a_ccch" dissector with
something that clearly is transportetd over the downlink SACCH and not over the
CCCH.

As dissect_ccch() comments state: "The name CCCH might not be correct!"

So in reality, what dissect_ccch() is, is a RR dissector for the "information
field of LAPDm B4 and Bbis frames".  Maybe it should be renamed? But then, we'd
change the name for register_dissector and would have to rename this in various
places.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-bugs mailing list <wireshark-bugs@wireshark.org>
Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs
             mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

Reply via email to