URL: 
https://code.wireshark.org/review/gitweb?p=wireshark.git;a=commit;h=f9ed58759fca787b6d3b4c2a988d714014b5ddc6
Submitter: Anders Broman (a.broma...@gmail.com)
Changed: branch: master
Repository: wireshark

Commits:

f9ed587 by Peter Wu (pe...@lekensteyn.nl):

    ssl: fix duplicate dissections with multiple PDUs in a stream
    
    The previous fix was incomplete and would still result in duplicate PDU
    dissections starting from the second reassembled PDU in a TLS stream.
    The reason for that is that "nxtseq" is the absolute offset within a TLS
    application data stream where the current segment ends while the
    reassembled PDU length ("ipfd_head->datalen") is likely smaller than
    "nxtseq".
    
    Note: this fix assumes that the there won't be another (partial) PDU
    following a reassembled PDU in a single packet (that is, the condition
    "nxtseq > msp->nxtpdu" is assumed not to occur). If that is not the
    case, a different issue occurs which needs another fix (more work):
    "Reassembly error, protocol SSL: Frame already added in first pass".
    
    Change-Id: Ib546f6e85baa0670c2c6a31ee8de87422004ecf3
    Bug: 14596
    Fixes: v2.1.0rc0-1521-gcefd1d4910 ("ssl: avoid duplicate PDU dissections")
    Reviewed-on: https://code.wireshark.org/review/26935
    Petri-Dish: Peter Wu <pe...@lekensteyn.nl>
    Tested-by: Petri Dish Buildbot
    Reviewed-by: Anders Broman <a.broma...@gmail.com>
    

Actions performed:

    from  3a30bc3   RPM: enable rpm target even if git is not available
    adds  f9ed587   ssl: fix duplicate dissections with multiple PDUs in a 
stream


Summary of changes:
 epan/dissectors/packet-ssl.c | 7 +++----
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-commits mailing list <wireshark-commits@wireshark.org>
Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-commits
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-commits
             mailto:wireshark-commits-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

Reply via email to