Ronnie,

Currently the latest version on their is 18803, as soon as 18804 is there 
I'll give it a try and let you know.

Unfortunately I do not know much about H.450 other than it is used for 
supplementary services within H.323.

The information below was taken from
http://www.protocols.com


      H.450.1 Series defines Supplementary Services for H.323
      H.450.2 Call Transfer supplementary service for H.323
      H.450.3 Call diversion supplementary service for H.323
      H.450.4 Call Hold supplementary service
      H.450.5 Call Park supplementary service
      H.450.6 Call Waiting supplementary service
      H.450.7 Message Waiting Indication supplementary service
      H.450.8 Calling Party Name Presentation supplementary service
      H.450.9 Completion of Calls to Busy Subscribers supplementary service
      H.450.10 Call Offer supplementary service
      H.450.11 Call Intrusion supplementary service
      H.450.12 ANF-CMN supplementary service


Keith.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "ronnie sahlberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Developer support list for Wireshark" <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>
Sent: Friday, July 28, 2006 8:53 AM
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Small [Patch] to H.323 VoIP calls


> checked in
>
> Keith,   can you verify this solves your problem?
> Also,   there is no page for H450 on the wiki    wiki.wireshark.org
> maybe you can add a small page with some information about this
> protocol?
>
>
> you dont have to wait for the next release.
> you can test on win32 using the automatically prerelease builds that
> are available from
> http://www.wireshark.org/download/automated/win32
>
> please try SVN version 18804 or later
>
>
>
> On 7/27/06, Martin Mathieson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Thanks for the capture, Keith.  The problem was with h450 hf fields that
>> weren't initialised sucessfully (at all in one case, or with non-unique
>> filter strings in several others) - it was hitting an assertion in 
>> proto.c
>> when an attempt was made to use those fields.
>>
>> I was able to test by editing packet-h450.c directly, I couldn't 
>> regenerate
>> it from packet-h450-template.c.  I'm attaching a patch to
>> packet-h450-template.c that hopefully does the same thing.  If someone 
>> can
>> generate and check it packet-h450.c in for me I'll retest.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Martin
> _______________________________________________
> Wireshark-dev mailing list
> Wireshark-dev@wireshark.org
> http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
>
>
> -- 
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.10.4/402 - Release Date: 27/07/2006
> 



-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.10.4/402 - Release Date: 27/07/2006

_______________________________________________
Wireshark-dev mailing list
Wireshark-dev@wireshark.org
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev

Reply via email to