On Mon, Sep 18, 2006 at 05:39:56PM +0200, Ulf Lamping wrote:
> BTW: Why is this dissector named dcp and uses dcp as it's filter string?!?
>
> The specs uses "Datagram Congestion Control Protocol" and DCCP everywhere, so
> this is quite confusing to use dcp for the filter.
That was discussed when the dissctor was sent to the list: There already
is a dissector for a protocol named dccp, so dccp got the name it had in
early stages of its name: dcp. We just don't have a solution to handle
protocols with the same name - that is going to happen from time to
time (the earliest time we had this problem was to rename packet-sccp to
packet-skinny).
ciao
Joerg
--
Joerg Mayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
We are stuck with technology when what we really want is just stuff that
works. Some say that should read Microsoft instead of technology.
_______________________________________________
Wireshark-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
