Hi, No need, already patched the patch ;)
Thanx, Jaap On Wed, 20 Sep 2006, Joerg Mayer wrote: > On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 04:27:43PM +0200, Jaap Keuter wrote: > > Too bad, since the patch doesn't match RFC 4590 table 2. > > Care to fix it? > > The only thing I could do is to revert the patch. Should I do that? > > Ciao > Joerg _______________________________________________ Wireshark-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
