Hi,

On Wed, 27 Sep 2006, Rolf Fiedler wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I am the author of the eyesdn wiretap module. Recently we added ATM
> support to our trace format. We used channel id 129 for that, so far
> only 0 for D channel and 1-30 for bearer channels had been in use.
>

I've taken the liberty to keep the sanity check in place and added 129 as
as valid channel ID.

Thanx,
Jaap

_______________________________________________
Wireshark-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev

Reply via email to