Hi,

I've done *basic* versions of the protocol pages in the wiki:
http://wiki.wireshark.org/IPCProtocolFamily (*very* basic)
http://wiki.wireshark.org/LINX
http://wiki.wireshark.org/TIPC

Could someone please delete linx-example-capture-query-name.png and
linx-example-capture-query-name-sized.png which are attached to the
LINX site?

Regards,
Martin


On 10/9/06, Anders Broman (AL/EAB) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> Chose the one you like :) it can always be changed later.
> BR
> Anders
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Peylo
> Sent: den 9 oktober 2006 09:35
> To: Developer support list for Wireshark
> Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] New dissector for Enea's LINX protocol
>
> Hi,
>
> I was just starting to add LINX to the wiki but I'm not able to classify
> it. It should be in the same category as TIPC but there's no entry for
> that.
>
> I would add something like ClusterProtocolFamily or
> InterProcessCommunicationProtocolFamily - what do you think?
>
> Regards,
> Martin
>
>
> On 10/6/06, Martin Peylo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm busy with other tasks right now but I'll add the protocol to the
> > Wiki and upload sample captures within the next days!
> >
> > Regards,
> > Martin
> >
> >
> >
> > On 10/5/06, Jaap Keuter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Now that we've added your dissector to the repository could you
> > > write up a protocol page in the Wiki? Oh, the sample capture goes
> > > onto SampleCaptures of course.
> > >
> > > Thanx,
> > > Jaap
> > >
> > > On Wed, 4 Oct 2006, Martin Peylo wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > could anybody please check the attached dissector for Enea's LINX
> > > protocol?
> > > >
> > > > A protocol spec is available at
> > > > <http://www.enea.com/templates/Extension____8947.aspx>. The source
>
> > > > of the kernel module could be obtained from Enea by sending a
> > > > request to "linx at enea dot com".
> > > >
> > > > Currently they use ethertype 0x9999 which is not registered at
> > > > IEEE. I was told they requested one - what should to be done about
> that?
> > > >
> > > > Please come back to me with any remarks!
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Martin
> > > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Wireshark-dev mailing list
> > > [email protected]
> > > http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
> > >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Wireshark-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
> _______________________________________________
> Wireshark-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
>
_______________________________________________
Wireshark-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev

Reply via email to