yes
On 10/15/06, Joerg Mayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> When looking at the dissector, I wondered whether the following patch
> would be ok/appropriate:
>
> Index: epan/dissectors/packet-usb.c
> ===================================================================
> --- epan/dissectors/packet-usb.c (revision 19541)
> +++ epan/dissectors/packet-usb.c (working copy)
> @@ -556,7 +556,7 @@
> proto_register_field_array(proto_usb, hf, array_length(hf));
> proto_register_subtree_array(usb_subtrees, array_length(usb_subtrees));
>
> - register_dissector("eth", dissect_usb, proto_usb);
> + register_dissector("usb", dissect_usb, proto_usb);
> }
>
> void
>
>
>
> ciao
> Joerg
>
> --
> Joerg Mayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> We are stuck with technology when what we really want is just stuff that
> works. Some say that should read Microsoft instead of technology.
> _______________________________________________
> Wireshark-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
>
_______________________________________________
Wireshark-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
