Jaap Keuter wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> If all our supported platforms agree on this we can vote for "net-snmp
> only".
> 
> Thanx,
> Jaap
> 
> On Mon, 13 Nov 2006, Stephen Fisher wrote:
> 
>> On Tue, Nov 14, 2006 at 12:23:29AM +0100, Joerg Mayer wrote:
>>
>>> usb-nsmp has been superceeded by net-snmp for quite a while now.
>>> ucd-snmp is unmaintained. Is there any good reason why we should
>>> continue to support both, ucd-snmp and net-snmp?
>> I see no reason to continue supporting ucd-snmp as it's long gone.
>>
>>
>> Steve
>>
> 

+1 from me. I don't any need for it.

Radek


-- 
Radek Vokál <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Base OS Engineering - Team Lead

Office: +420 543 422 235
Red Hat Inc.                               http://www.redhat.com
_______________________________________________
Wireshark-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev

Reply via email to