On Fri, 17 Nov 2006, Guy Harris wrote: > > On Nov 17, 2006, at 6:15 PM, Ulf Lamping wrote: > > > Any comments? > > As long as all versions of glib we'll be using support the %ll > versions in the g_*printf routines, or define PRI...64 equivalents > that work with those routines, that sounds like the right solution.
Ack. > If the "don't use these routines" testing we're looking at for ntoh* > and hton* works, we could extend it to check for sprintf (which nobody > should be using anyway!) and snprintf (the removal of references to > which would let us get rid of the copy we have). We've dropped that copy already. Thanx, Jaap _______________________________________________ Wireshark-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
