Andrew Schweitzer wrote: > Andrew Schweitzer wrote: >> John R. wrote: >>> Insofar as I have a workaround, I described it in the bug report. >>> >> hm.... didn't seem to work in my case. I still lose two packets.... >> maybe I screwed something up. >> > > Hey it works if I use 1000000 rather than -1!
hm... now getting problems further down... tried with larger capture from the test tool, this time 5000 messags, seed 1. At packet ~294 it says "Illegal Segments" and stops passing the packets to the dissector. _______________________________________________ Wireshark-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
