"Seconds since 1970-01-01 00:00:00 GMT: 1234567890.123456" (should that be UTC?)
is quite a long menu item. I think that there is also an advantage in having the word "epoch" in there as it ties to the command line 'e' sub-switch to '-t' and the names in the code. I'd favour "Seconds since UNIX Epoch: 1234567890.123456" as it is about the length of the existing longest item and that people who want it would know what it is. But whatever would be best for most people... -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Guy Harris Sent: 05 December 2006 23:49 To: Developer support list for Wireshark Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Patch adding option to display time asseconds(and fractions) since epoch On Dec 5, 2006, at 1:57 PM, Ulf Lamping wrote: > As a Windows user I don't know what an "epoch time" is. Not all Unix users know what it is, either. > Would it be > better to use "Seconds Since Unix Epoch" or even better "Seconds Since > 1.1.1970"? Or "since 1970-01-01 00:00:00 GMT", to use something closer to the ISO standard, and to indicate the time as well as the date of the epoch. _______________________________________________ Wireshark-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev This message should be regarded as confidential. If you have received this email in error please notify the sender and destroy it immediately. Statements of intent shall only become binding when confirmed in hard copy by an authorised signatory. The contents of this email may relate to dealings with other companies within the Detica Group plc group of companies. Detica Limited is registered in England under No: 1337451. Registered offices: Surrey Research Park, Guildford, Surrey, GU2 7YP, England. _______________________________________________ Wireshark-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
