Martin Mathieson wrote: > For the more general problem, I see 2 possible solutions: > (1) have both signed and values in the union, and use the appropriate > signed or unsigned parts of the union in the comparison functions > (2) leave the union as it is with unsigned members, cast values in all > the signed versions instead of the unsigned versions
I vote for solution 1 (and have everything that adds a signed value to the protocol tree set the signed value in the union). _______________________________________________ Wireshark-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
