Accepted or not, I needed to do something to get my working copy compiled. Attached is the patch if you like to use it.
Thanks Andrej On Wed, 31.Jan.07 12:29:30 +0100, Andrej Mikus wrote: > On Mon, 29.Jan.07 12:49:00 -0800, Gerald Combs wrote: > > Andrej Mikus wrote: > > > > > In file to_str.c I notice function address_to_str_buf that takes buf_len > > > as argument, but does not use it for IPv4 and IPv6 addresses: > > > > > Unfortunately, there wasn't a mechanism to ensure that the buffer was > > big enough. I've checked in a change (r20607) that should fix this. It > > looks like this could potentially affect the ISUP statistics, so I'll > > add it to the advisory list for 0.99.5. > > I was planning to propose a patch already (attached), so this allowed me > to see how Subversion handles conflicts :-) > > IMO, the function should return an error string instead of cowardly > bailing out with an empty string. > > inet_ntop does the latter by default, so it does not need any additional > check, just passing buf_len instead of INET6_ADDRSTRLEN. > > At the other side I like the check you made into ip_to_str_buf. > > My proposal would be to combine the patches and use MAX_IP_STR_LEN, > and approach below for both IPv4 and IPv6 in address_to_str_buf. > > case AT_IPv6: > +<<<<<<< .mine > + if ( inet_ntop(AF_INET6, addr->data, buf, buf_len) == NULL ) /* Returns > NULL if no space and does not touch buf */ > + g_snprintf ( buf, buf_len, "@@@@@@@@" ); /* Let the > unexpected value alert user */ > > If accepted, I am ready to supply a patch on top of current rev .r20649 > Let me know pls. > > Andrej > _______________________________________________ > Wireshark-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
my_patch.gz
Description: application/gunzip
_______________________________________________ Wireshark-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
