Guy Harris wrote: > On Jan 31, 2007, at 8:13 PM, Shehjar Tikoo wrote: > If you mean a dissector for ONC RPC running over TCP, which is a > heuristic dissector (as there is no standard set of ports for ONC RPC, > other than 111 for the portmapper/rpcbind and 2049 for NFS), why not > modify the existing one to do what you need? Having two heuristic > dissectors for the *same* protocol makes no sense whatsoever; either > modify one to do what you need, or build a special private version of > Wireshark with your dissector replacing the standard one.
Yes, I'll modify the existing ones. Thanks Shehjar _______________________________________________ Wireshark-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
