On 2/5/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello Jeff, > Thank you for your comments, I will follow your advices and request a new > DLT for MTP2 with FCS. > But before, I will, first, ask for the agreement of the board manufacturer. > I hope they will not disagree.. > > In the same time, if someone has samples of use for the MTP2 DLT, it could > be very helpfull. > Maybe, the right way will be to have : > - DLT_MTP2_noFCS for K12 files,
k12 files use a single WTAP_ENCAP_K12 and the actual protocol is choosen by name by the user associating it with the ".stk" file declared for a given port. As far as the dissecctor handle called by the name "mtp2" does not change its behaviour there's no problem. > - DLT_MTP2_FCS, for this board. > - and to keep the current DLT_MTP2 for compatibility. _______________________________________________ Wireshark-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
