Thank you for your comment and insight. I'll implement them and
see how it looks.

--Kriang

Martin Mathieson wrote:

>
>
>     This patch only touches K12's part. There are a few parameters
>     for FP that the patch still does not provide together with my idea
>     for
>     future
>     work:
>     - The UMTS release number - This will go into a preference setting. FP
>     dissector
>       should use a default release from preference when it is not given in
>     packet info.
>
>
> This sounds OK, 0 in the struct could mean that the preference setting 
> should be used.  There are only one or two places where the 
> sub-release can affect the message format, these are currently tied to 
> the DCT2000 variant.  I think, though, that because the message 
> formats are based on 3 different specs, it may be better if I convert 
> this into a quarter (e.g. 0306 for the March '06 release onwards).   
> Again a preference could be used if the info isn't available from the 
> file.
>
>  
>
>     - DCH CRC flag - By tweaking .rf5 file and feed to K12 reader, I found
>     that it
>       relies on how many bytes remain after the transport block. If there
>     are enough
>       bytes, it always treat the last 2 bytes as CRC.
>
>
> This seems to be a safe thing to do in practice, even although the 
> spec has (I think) 0-2 bytes of spare extension bytes for DCH, and 
> more for other channel types.  The FP dissector currently does this 
> for EDCH channels, as our stack used to always add it.
>
> Best regards,
> Martin
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>_______________________________________________
>Wireshark-dev mailing list
>[email protected]
>http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
>  
>

_______________________________________________
Wireshark-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev

Reply via email to