Thanks lot for your answer. Packet trace anonymization was exactly the point I am interested in :)
Regards, Chris > > My question is, is it possible to use the Wireshark disectors to "build" >a > > trace. What I mean with this is, is it e.q. possible to change values in >the > > Wireshark GUI and then have Wireshark build the binary trace together? I > > know that in the current version this is not possible, but my question >is in > > general. Is it possible to extend the Wireshark disectors to be able to > > "build" a trace? > >No; that feature's missing from the current version because the >infrastructure for it isn't available, not because Wireshark chooses not >to implement it. > >This is probably significantly more complicated than one might think, >especially given packet reassembly. A mechanism to do that would be >useful for manually editing packets (e.g., to construct a sequence of >packets to replay), as well as for the anonymization feature another >person would like to implement - but it'd require architectural work. >_______________________________________________ >Wireshark-dev mailing list >[email protected] >http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev _________________________________________________________________ Die neue MSN Suche Toolbar mit Windows-Desktopsuche. Suchen Sie gleichzeitig im Web, Ihren E-Mails und auf Ihrem PC! - http://desktop.msn.de/ Kostenlos downloaden! _______________________________________________ Wireshark-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
