Gerhard Gappmeier wrote:
> I see. This works a little bit different than I expected.
> void method(int _U_)
> {
> }
> just becomes
> void method(int )
> {
> }
> I'm not sure if every compiler accepts that or also outputs a warning if the
> parameter name is missing.
In fact it should be used like:
void method(int foo _U_)
which should become
void method(int foo __attribute__((unused)))
I'm not sure if _U_ is implemented for anything other than GCC, though.
What compiler are you using?
_______________________________________________
Wireshark-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
